View all Ask a Priest |
“Ask a Priest: What About Pope Francis and the Traditional Latin Mass?”
Q: What do you think about what our beloved Holy Father said about the Latin Mass? I am curious but have never attended one. I personally think it is a good thing. The fruit I have seen from it (folks that attend Latin Mass are such devoted practicing Catholics). It makes total sense to move toward learning Latin so we all can travel and understand the Mass wherever we go. The language does not change or “evolve.” – P.
Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC
A: You are referring to Pope Francis’ recent apostolic letter Traditionis Custodes, which aims to give bishops more control over the celebration of the extraordinary form of the Roman-rite Mass.
This form is often referred to as the traditional Latin Mass or the Tridentine Mass (named for the Council of Trent, where it was approved).
Francis hasn’t prohibited the celebration of the Mass in Latin. The ordinary form (also known as the Novus Ordo, what is typically celebrated in parishes) could be celebrated in Latin if the pastor has the appropriate liturgical books and chooses to do so.
The Pope’s letter addresses the older form of the Mass which was always done in Latin. His document came in response to concerns from various bishops.
Let’s back up a bit to 2007.
In that year Pope Benedict XVI issued an apostolic letter that gave priests wide leeway to celebrate Mass in the extraordinary form. By making the older style of Mass more readily available to those who desired it, Benedict hoped that the move, among other things, would foster unity within the Church.
Yet, some bishops detected that the opposite has happened: that some people who embraced the traditional Latin Mass have done so in a divisive way.
Some people have used the traditional Latin Mass as a kind of launching pad from which to attack the Novus Ordo Mass and the Second Vatican Council, and to distance themselves from the mainstream of parish life. Francis’ letter aims to rein in that problem by shifting more authority from individual priests to the bishops.
Of course, not everyone who loves the traditional Latin Mass has caused division. Many fine Catholics love the Tridentine Mass for its sense of dignity and mystery, and they derive great benefit from it. Those folks can take comfort that Pope Francis hasn’t banned the Tridentine Mass outright; for it can still be celebrated with a bishop’s permission.
Indeed, in the wake of Francis’ letter, some bishops have stated that the groups in favor of the traditional Latin Mass have been something good for their diocese.
As for the ideal of everyone knowing Latin and being able to understand the Mass everywhere (in Latin): that has been an elusive goal. That is one reason why the Mass is commonly celebrated in the vernacular.
In any case, the bishops’ expanded oversight of the traditional Latin Mass could help ensure that it feeds the faithful in such a way to foster unity and not division within the Church.
Keep learning more with Ask a Priest
Got a question? Need an answer?
Today’s secular world throws curve balls at us all the time. AskACatholicPriest is a Q&A feature that anyone can use. Just type your question HERE and you will get a personal response back from one of our priests at RCSpirituality. You can ask about anything – liturgy, prayer, moral questions, current events… Our goal is simply to provide a trustworthy forum for dependable Catholic guidance and information. So go ahead and ask your question…
What did you think?
Share your review! Just log in or create your free account.
2 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
70 percent of Catholics who attend the Novus Ordo don’t believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist which technically and ironically means that they even with out admitting it or realizing it are saying that the mass is invalid. Yet, Traditional Catholics who go to TLM who (with exception of visitors or curious N.O. attendees) believe that the Eucharist is truly the Body blood soul and divinity of our Lord and they’re punished!! How?! The Pope is aiming to punish communities like SSPX who have a spirit of schism but his motto propio is hurting Catholics who have remained faithful to The Papacy’s authority and Vatican 2. (Which was a pastoral council not a dogmatic one) This motto propio leaves sspx and others who have a schismatic spirit un touched. It’s an out right attack on the Tradition. You have Cardinals and bishops like Cupich of Chicago who have no problem in giving the Eucharist to a none catholic gay couple (the mayor of Chicago) and has absolutely no problem with liturgical abuses in his diocese. But seems to hate! And restricts the Mas of the ages! Makes total sense
I attend the “ordinary expression” of the Roman Rite. However, and unfortunately, Pope Francis’ articulation of the reasons for restrictions/limitations on the 1962 Roman Missal are slim compared to Pope Benedict XVI’s articulation of the reasons for specified permissions (See July 7, 2007 letter to Bishops and his Apostolic letter of the same date). Pope Francis, in his July 16, 2021 letter, references a “search for ecclesial communion.” This reason is conclusory at best and absolutely will not lead to the communion or unity, from my perspective.
Pope Benedict, on the other hand, provided insightful, researched, and thoughtful justification for his approach. He explained: (a) the Latin liturgy in its various historical forms has inspired countless saints in their spiritual life; (b) the TLM was not abrogated by Vatican II; (c) it is not correct to refer to the two forms as two separate “rites”; and (d) the “legitimate aspirations” of those seeking to worship Jesus in the form of the TLM (among other reasoned points).
Are those seeking to worship the Lord in the TLM without legitimate aspirations? Pope Benedict thought otherwise and so do I. For example, my son loves the TLM and I believe it is an inspiration to him in his faith. I hope Pope Francis fully considers the legitimate aspirations of those faithful to the church and Jesus through the TLM.